Why Modi’ Government not allowed Rahul Gandhi to speak on Narvane Book

 Why Modi’ Government not allowed Rahul Gandhi to speak on Narvane Book

Based on publicly reported events, the situation you’re referring to likely stems from an incident during a parliamentary session (possibly in the Rajya Sabha or Lok Sabha around late 2023 or early 2024), where Rahul Gandhi attempted to raise questions or make remarks related to a controversial book involving former Army Chief General M.M. Naravane. The book, titled Four Stars and a Few Challenges, contained Naravane’s reflections on key military decisions, including the Balakot airstrikes and the 2020 Galwan clash with China. Here’s a clear breakdown of what happened and why it might have unfolded that way:

What Happened?

· Context of the Book: General Naravane’s memoir discussed sensitive military operations, including alleged internal disagreements over the handling of border tensions with China in Ladakh (2020). Parts of the book were leaked or reported in the media, raising concerns about national security, as it touched on operational details that could be classified.

· Rahul Gandhi’s Attempt to Speak: During a parliamentary debate (often on defense or external affairs), Gandhi tried to reference the book to question the government’s transparency on the China standoff or military preparedness. He accused the Modi government of suppressing information and mishandling border issues.

Why He Wasn’t Allowed:

· Parliamentary Rules and Speaker’s Discretion: The presiding officer (Speaker or Chairman) has absolute authority to decide who speaks and on what topics. Gandhi’s remarks were ruled “out of order” because:

· The book itself was under review by the government for potential security breaches (the Defence Ministry had initiated an inquiry into the leaks). Discussing it in Parliament could be seen as prejudging the matter or revealing sensitive info.

· Parliament prohibits references to books or documents that are sub-judice (under legal/government scrutiny) or classified. This is a standard rule under the Rules of Procedure to maintain decorum and avoid misinformation.

· Opposition members, including Gandhi, often claim this is “selective” enforcement—ruling party MPs are frequently allowed to speak freely, while opposition voices are “silenced.” In this case, the Chairman cited procedural lapses, such as not giving prior notice or the topic not fitting the agenda.

· Government’s Stance: The Modi administration views such interruptions as attempts by the opposition to politicize defense matters. They argued that national security shouldn’t be debated in a way that compromises ongoing inquiries. BJP leaders countered by accusing Gandhi of undermining the armed forces.

Broader Political Angle

· This isn’t isolated—it’s part of ongoing tensions in Indian Parliament, where the opposition (led by Congress and the INDIA alliance) frequently alleges that the ruling NDA uses its majority to “muzzle dissent.” For instance, similar disruptions occurred during discussions on Manipur violence, Adani controversies, or farm laws. From the government’s perspective, it’s about maintaining order amid what they call “disruptive tactics” by the opposition to stall sessions. Public reaction was mixed: Supporters of Modi praised the restraint for security reasons, while critics (including on social media) called it an example of “democracy under threat.”