Why Nitish Government Protecting the perpetrators of the death of a NEET aspirant at Shambhu Girls' Hostel?
Why Nitish Government Protecting the perpetrators of the death of a NEET aspirant at Shambhu Girls' Hostel
The query
appears to refer to recent allegations surrounding the death of a NEET aspirant
at Shambhu Girls' Hostel (also spelled "Shambhu" in some reports) in
Patna, Bihar, under the Nitish Kumar-led NDA government. The incident involves
suspicions of rape and murder, with opposition parties and public figures
accusing the government of protecting the perpetrators or mishandling the case
to cover it up. I'll outline the key details and the reasons cited in these
allegations based on available reports and discussions. Note that these are
accusations from critics, and the investigation is ongoing, with some arrests
made.
Background on the Incident
A teenage
girl preparing for the NEET exam was found unconscious at Shambhu Girls' Hostel
in Patna's Chitragupta Nagar area on January 12, 2026. She was rushed to a
hospital but died shortly after. Her family alleged foul play, including rape
and murder. Initially, Bihar Police denied any evidence of sexual assault and
suggested it was a suicide by poison or pills. However, the post-mortem report,
released around January 14, indicated that sexual violence could not be ruled
out, leading to contradictions and public outrage. The hostel owner, Manish
Kumar Ranjan, was arrested on January 15, and the facility was sealed. The case
has been sent for further review at AIIMS-Patna, and a Special Investigation
Team (SIT) is involved, with some police officers suspended for lapses.
Allegations of Government Protection and Reasons
Cited
Opposition
leaders (primarily from RJD and Congress), activists, and social media users
have accused the Nitish Kumar government of shielding the accused or enabling a
cover-up. Here's a breakdown of the main reasons highlighted in these claims:
- Initial Police Denial and
Alleged Cover-Up:
Critics argue that the police's quick dismissal of rape—despite the
post-mortem findings—suggests an attempt to protect influential figures.
For instance, doctors, station in-charge, ASP, SP, and SSP reportedly
denied rape and labeled it suicide, which opposition figures call a
deliberate mislead to bury the truth. RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav described
the NDA government as "a tool for oppressors, corrupt individuals,
criminals, and rapists," claiming atrocities are committed with
official support while authorities remain silent.
- Political Connections and
Influence:
Some reports and posts suggest the hostel owner has ties to BJP leaders
(part of the NDA coalition with Nitish's JD(U)), which may explain the
alleged protection. One claim is that the BJP tried to divert attention by
insisting on suicide, but the report confirmed rape and murder. Broader
accusations point to unlicensed hostels operating as fronts for
exploitation, possibly with government complicity through funding or
oversight failures. There are even unverified claims of hostels being used
as sex rackets, drugging students and trafficking them to political
elites.
- Delays and Intimidation in
Investigation:
Public demands highlight issues like delayed family notifications,
mysterious hospital transfers, untraceable staff, withheld CCTV footage,
and alleged pressure to withdraw complaints. These are seen as signs of
systemic protection for the guilty. Congress leaders burned effigies of
Nitish Kumar, protesting the government's failure on girls' safety.
- Broader Pattern of Law and
Order Failures:
Critics link this to past scandals, like the 2018 Muzaffarpur shelter home
rapes, where Nitish was accused of shielding accused with ruling party
links. Recent cases, such as other rapes in Bihar (e.g., in Chhapra or Madhepura),
are cited to argue that the "double-engine" NDA government
(Nitish at state, Modi at center) prioritizes power over justice, making
Bihar unsafe for women.
Comments
Post a Comment